How exactly would/should a fitter replace the longest iron with an ‘easier’ to hit club? For one thing, the golf ball does not know what kind of clubhead hit him.
For context, I was reading the Irons chapter of the Titleist fitting manual, and it revealed some interesting points. The main one being the longest iron a golfer should play is the where he can maintain a descent angle of 45 degrees, and a 5mph ball speed difference between clubs. So for framing my question, lets just say thats the gospel.
So my descent angle with my 22 degree 4 iron is 42 degrees. Maybe its time to toss that out and replace with a what?
One might say that would be a 22 degree hybrid, but if shaft length is the same, and assuming no hot face, surely the ball if struck on the COG with the same dynamic loft, at the same clubhead speed, will have all the same flight metrics as the 4 iron, as the ball doesnt know what hit it. A hybrid can have different design characteristics, but if I am not wrong, things like a low COG are to help golfers get the ball in the air because they already hit the ball low on the face.
So am I right that the only way to increase the descent angle (thus peak height) will be to increase clubhead speed?
The fitter can do that either by a hot face or longer shaft. Then if a longer shaft we most likely need a clubhead thats much more easier to hit. Then some fine tuning of the of the loft to find the happy place.
It does sound like I am talking myself into a 7 wood
The new Mizuno Optimizer app can recommend the minimum loft for how you load the shaft