Chart says MPF IS 90. Is that correct?
Definitely the correct MPF. It appears they concentrated hard on getting the look of what their perception of a modern Hogan blade should look like, but forgot about the design basics of the mass and dimensional characteristics that actually make a club playable. It has a long hosel, short blade length and extremely narrow sole. Actual vertical cg was high as well. I have not been able to check other models in the Hogan line. I would hope they would be more playable.