Chart says MPF IS 90. Is that correct?
Definitely the correct MPF. It appears they concentrated hard on getting the look of what their perception of a modern Hogan blade should look like, but forgot about the design basics of the mass and dimensional characteristics that actually make a club playable. It has a long hosel, short blade length and extremely narrow sole. Actual vertical cg was high as well. I have not been able to check other models in the Hogan line. I would hope they would be more playable.
Britt Lindsey
Finally hit the range yesterday.They felt very solid and workable. At impact they are a little solid feel to them. It may be the nippon shafts as I have never hit those before. Using skycaddie as a reference the TS1 are 7-10 yards longer than the two sets I normally use. Lofts are 2 degrees stronger on average. Impact feel is similar to the fort worths. My Ballistic Irons are a little softer but once again different shafts. KBS 105.
180 +yard 6 iron which i havent seen in a few years. Looking forward to getting familiar with them. Very pleased with your product.
I have a set and play to a 5. I just ordered a set of TS 1 and looked at the mpf for both. Was very surprised however hopefully I can hit a little less club into the greens