MOI is a part of it, but overall playability is the most important thing. Important to understand the MOI in irons usually runs between around 11.000 to a 17.00, with a high percentage being between 11.000 and 14.000. That is really not a lot of difference. Of all the data points we use to calculate playability for irons, MOI has the least affect. In other words, a small increase in MOI might move the MPF a few points, but a small increase or improvement in the horizontal cg or vertical cg or rearward cg (and by small I mean fractions of a millimeter to 1 or 2 mm) can have a more positive affect. Good MOI can be a result of having the cg in the most optimum place in all the dimensions. You can also have a club with a High MOI, but have the cg not optimized. Ralph explains that as “Bad MOI” in the book, so I won’t go into the detail here as it is lengthy explanation of the difference of Good MOI and Bad MOI, but trust that it is a thing.
So, I would say a design with a Good high MOI would be optimal, but I would focus on the overall playability vs just the MOI. I would take a high MPF with a 12.5000 MOI over a low MPF with a 16.000 MOI every day. Our KE4 Tour FDI Utility Driving irons have MOI of 14.8108 (#4) for reference and I play the #3 and the #4 with my 5-PW TS4’s. The FDI’s are awesome for me of the tee, long par 3’s, second shots into long par4’s, etc. Just easier to hit for me than the traditional long irons and better for me than regular hybrids. The Titleist T350 is an excellent design and would work well too. Combines high MPF and High MOI.
One last thing about MOI, in putters, MOI is a much bigger factor in the stability and overall playability. Putter MOI’s that we measure have ranged from 10.000 and below to 50.000 and beyond. Like anything else, if you strike the ball with a putter perfectly every time the MOI doesn’t matter. However, on putters, the off center hit with a high MOI design will roll closer to the intended distance and line than putters with low MOI. Irons the variance is much smaller and thus the measurable affect is much smaller.
Hope this helps.
Britt Lindsey
Thanks a lot for your explanatory answer Britt.
As always, it is a pleasure asking questions in this forum.
Cheers,
Jorge