The S2H2 in my opinion is not the easiset to hit; however they get a Maltby rating over 1000. Why ?
Britt Lindsey Answered question November 12, 2020
The S2H2 in my opinion is not the easiset to hit; however they get a Maltby rating over 1000. Why ?
The S2H2 has a long c-dimension and a really low vertical center of gravity. Those are two key elements of playability / forgiveness. Longer c-demension (distance from hosel centerline to horizontal cg location) makes the design really stable, especially on off center hits. Lower cg is easier to drive below the cg of the ball, providing more solid feel and better, more consistent trajectory. MPF is all about the mass and dimensional characteristics of the design. A high MPF doesn’t guarantee you or anyone else will like the club. It could be the fit, the look, something in your action … a number of things that might prevent you from hitting them well. One thing it is not is the instability or bad mass and weight distribution of the head design. In the S2H2’s case, those are very good and would not contribute to bad performance.
Britt Lindsey
I am glad to know. Although they look like a blade, they are more playable than the Epic Irons I acquired recently. Surprising. From what I see, Golf companies focus more on disatance and delofting clubs than on playability. I have seen some exceptions, notably the T400 Titleist, which accordind to the ratings are less playable than the T300. As you said, physics is physics.