The MCC was a good model. Classic Players cavity with high playability. I know there are quite a few still in play even after 17 years. I would say in the current line our TE+ would be the most similar, only better. The lofts are stronger in the TE+, more to the modern standards. The TE+ #6 iron is 28 degrees and the MCC #6 iron is 31 degrees. We improved the heel area on the TE+ vs the MCC (not as chunky looking), in my opinion, and improved the horizontal cg location (making it more stable) which is why the TE+ ranks higher in the MPF ratings. Both are considered Super Game Improvement irons, but the TE+ is slightly higher rated. The TE+ also has our Multi-Groove face, which all of irons do now. Another model that does have a progressive cavity design like the MCC did and is considered a players cavity is the TS3. It is forged as well, but may have a little different profile than the MCC or TE+.
If the strong lofts aren’t a deal breaker, the TE+ may be the ones to look at.
Britt Lindsey
That sounds fine, thank you. So it´s the TE+. Thank you!!!
I Play my MCC with the FST 115 shaft.
I guess I´ll go for that again.
Considering other brands, what would you say are kind of similar feeling
similar flight and spin shafts?