Hey Britt, So I know you made some slight changes, but any preliminary results on the MPF rating, are looking to stay around that 714 super game improvement category Like the MMB-17, or maybe a little more or a little less?
Hey Britt, So I know you made some slight changes, but any preliminary results on the MPF rating, are looking to stay around that 714 super game improvement category Like the MMB-17, or maybe a little more or a little less?
People look at my TS-1’s now and comment on how good looking they are. They think they are Apex Pro’s until they look closer. The TS-4 pictures makes it look to be a level above that, in the Mizuno category, but to carry a 701+ MPF ? That makes it a breakthrough iron design.
Hard to say with the changes we made exactly what it will be. My educated guess is that it will be around what the MMB-17 was. Dimensionally I did not change it much from the first article and it was in the low 700’s. Would hope for at least 714. If I had to put a range estimate on it, 680-740. Going to be a Pure blade look with all the playability I can get into it for what its mass and dimensional characteristics are.
Britt Lindsey
Britt, We’re curious if you’ve measured the mpf numbers for the upcoming TS4. It was a surprise seeing the TS3 almost in the super game improvement category. What caused its rating to increase from what was projected?